Showing posts with label conflicts of interest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conflicts of interest. Show all posts

June 27, 2016

CCO Series: Top Regulatory Deficiencies for RIAs -- Advisory Agreements

What you need to know

Examiners will review agreements that the advisor uses for its client engagements during an examination as a standard request item. This will include a review of the agreement templates that you use for your prospective clients and a sample of agreements that your firm has executed with existing clients. In reviewing agreements examiners report finding two common deficiencies: 1) the fees are not fully disclosed in the agreement and 2) that firms do not have an executed copy of its client agreements in the advisor’s books and records.

Common Deficiency: Fees fully disclosed

The written advisory agreement must detail the relationship that the client is entering into with the advisor, including how fees are calculated and the payment methodology. The fees section of the agreement must be comprehensive to cover all fees being charged for the services, when the fees are being charged, and how they are to be paid. The information in the client agreement should also align with the general disclosure of fees made in Form ADV Part 2A Disclosure Brochure in Item 5. Any additional compensation that the firm receives in its advisory practice should also be described in Form ADV Part 2A in Item 14.

Common Deficiency: Books and records

Advisors are required to keep and maintain all written agreements (or copies thereof) entered into by the advisor with any client.1Examiners are reporting to the North American Securities Administrators Association that advisors are not creating written agreements for all of their client relationships. They also noted that when written agreements are created, the agreements are not clearly noting, and adequately explaining, the advisory fees as described above.2

How do we avoid these deficiencies?

To avoid these deficiencies at your firm AdvisorAssist recommends the best practices of:

  • Reviewing the language in your Form ADV Part 2A Disclosure Brochure to ensure that it adequately discloses for each type of fee the following:
    1. How fees accrue for each service offered.
    2. How fees are billed to the clients.
    3. Whether the advisory fees include other fees, such as brokerage trading fees.
    4. How fees are impacted by contract termination, such as a pro-rata refund if collected in advance.
    5. Whether the fees represent any compensation for the sales of securities or other conflicts of interest.
  • For each new client onboarded, ensure that a written agreement is executed for the services that the client will receive and the fee is consistent with Form ADV Part 2A.
  • Review client agreement[s] templates and Form ADV Part 2A at least annually to ensure that the fees described are consistent and fully disclosed.

1. See 17 CFR §275.204-2(a)(10). Link. ↩
2. See North American Securities Administrators Association, “2015 Investment Adviser Coordinated Exams,”. Link. ↩

AdvisorAssist’s CCO Series: Regulatory Deficiencies for RIAs is a series of articles that will help your firm understand and avoid the most common compliance deficiencies found by regulators. Our goal is to help you increase your confidence that your firm remains “exam ready” as well as some practical steps to help Chief Compliance Officers address this topic.

Contributors:
Brendan Furey
Michael Conlon

December 11, 2012

FINRA proposes to require Brokers to Disclose Bonuses

In FINRA's continued quest for a role in the RIA segment, their 20-member board of governors voted on 12/10/12 to propose a rule that would require a registered representative that switches firms to disclose any compensation, bonus or other incentive received in the recruitment process.

This is important for the fiduciary movement, but is likely to result in continued departures from the brokerage firms. We expect significant pushback from member firms. RIAs must disclose the nature of ANY conflict of interest, including, but not limited to compensation from 3rd parties. However, they do not need to state specific dollar amounts. They are required to state the source and nature of any conflict and how they mitigate such conflict.

Financial Advisor magazine has good coverage on this topic (http://www.fa-mag.com/news/-brokers-must-disclose-bonuses-to-clients-in-finra-proposal-12791.html?section=43)

Opening the door to this disclosure will certainly change the recruitment dynamics and forge a path to disclosure of other perks. We'll continue to keep you apprised on this proposal. Please share any thoughts or questions.